Template:Title incomplete
In today's world, Template:Title incomplete is a topic that captures the attention and interest of a large number of people around the world. Whether due to its historical relevance, its impact on contemporary society or its influence on popular culture, Template:Title incomplete has become a recurring topic of conversation everywhere. From political debates to academic discussions, Template:Title incomplete continues to be a hot topic that sparks emotions, opinions and reflections in all spheres of life. With an importance that transcends borders, Template:Title incomplete continues to be a point of interest for individuals of all ages and backgrounds, consolidating itself as a topic that continues to generate interest and debate.
Note
View source to see what this template does. It is <includeonly>-wrapped so that the template itself is not categorized by the meta-template that it calls.
This template is just a variant of {{Title missing}}, and shares the same documentation:
{{Title missing}} (or {{title?}} for short) is an inline cleanup template flagging a broken source citation that is missing the title, or complete and correct title, of the cited material (or at least the specified fact that title information is not available).
It is most commonly used to replace a bad title, when an automated tool or an incautious user has uncritically accepted the value of a <title>...</title> from a Web page and the value is incorrect; many sites just repeat the name of the site (the work, in citation terms) in this field, and put the title of the actual page only in a <h1>...</h1> heading or elsewhere in the page's content. Another replacement case is when the information is wrong because an editor copy-pasted one source citation in the wikicode of the article to use it as the basis for another citation to a different source, and adjusted the URL and other information but forgot to change the title.
The template can also be used to tag for cleanup a truncated title or the fact that the title information simply has been omitted entirely. A common case of this is an unformatted citation to an unspecified work (e.g. "Johnson (2001)", without any corresponding further data on the source). This is because an editor just forgot to fill in the details, because someone assumed a source was so well known it did not need complete citation, or because the material was split from an overly long article into a new sub-topical article without ensuring that all citations made the trip with the content.
When the given title is questionable or outright disputed, then a dispute template of some kind, such as {{citation needed}}, {{dubious}}, or {{disputed-inline}}, etc., should be used instead.
For a short citation (e.g. "Smith 2001") that is missing a corresponding full citation, or a citation that is so brief as to be unverifiable (e.g. "Article in The Washington Post"), use {{full citation needed}} instead.
Usage
Do not place this template in any Citation Style 1 citation's |title= parameter. All text in |title= the parameter is made part of the citation's COinS metadata. The |title= parameter should include title data only.
- For all free-form and Citation Style 1 citations ({{cite web}}, {{cite book}}, {{citation}}, etc.) place
{{Title missing|date=April 2025}}after the citation, typically just before the closing</ref>. - In the rare case of a partial title (e.g. a botched copy-paste), you can change the displayed text to: [title incomplete] using
{{title missing|partial=yes}}or{{title incomplete}}
How to fix the problem flagged by this template
Do not remove the template without fixing the problem one of the following ways.
- If you know the title, fill in the needed information, and remove the template.
- For a template-formatted citation, there's really only one thing to do:
|title=TitleOfCitedItem
- For a free-form citation:
- Just add the title to the citation; or...
- Better yet, convert the entire citation to this {{cite journal}}, {{cite news}} or some other {{cite xxx}}-series template, as appropriate for the work in question.
- If you know that no title was specified by the original source, explicitly state this, using (to be clear that this is an editorial statement not an actual title):
|title=- or for free-form citations:
- Do not use question marks.
- Do not just repeat the work (publication/site) name, publisher or other field.
- Do not leave the information blank and untag it, or someone else will just come along later and flag this with {{title missing}} again!
- Do not use
|title=none,|title=unknownor anything else vague; any implication other that the source itself did not specify a title is simply a signal to other editors to re-tag it with {{title missing}}.
- If you don't know:
- Check the source and add the necessary information, as above.
- Do not use question marks.
- If the source is a dead link, check archive.org for a backup copy (see your {{citation}}/{{cite xxx}}-type template's documentation for use of
|archiveurl=and|archivedate=parameters). If no archive copy is available, use {{dead link}} after the citation, but leave {{title missing}} as well.
Template data
The template is an inline cleanup template flagging a broken source citation that is missing the title, or complete and correct title, of the cited material.
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incomplete title | partial | Used if part of the title is present.
| Boolean | optional |
| Date | date | Provides the month and year of the citation request.
| Date | suggested |
See also
- Source citation guidelines
- Citation repair templates
- {{full citation needed}} – the catch-all
- {{author missing}}
- {{author incomplete}} – a variant for partial data
- {{date missing}}
- {{ISBN missing}}
- {{place missing}}
- {{publisher missing}}
- {{title missing}}
- {{title incomplete}} – a variant for partial data
- {{year missing}}
