In today's world, Glass OS is an issue that has gained relevance in various spheres of society. From politics to popular culture, Glass OS has captured the attention of all types of audiences. With an impact that goes beyond geographical borders, Glass OS has become a reference point for understanding the contemporary panorama. In this article, we will explore this phenomenon in depth, analyzing its implications and consequences in different areas. From its origin to its future projection, Glass OS deserves to be examined in detail to understand its influence today.
Developer | |
---|---|
Written in | C (core), C++, Java[1] |
OS family | Android |
Working state | discontinued |
Source model | Open source with closed source components[2] |
Initial release | XE4 / April 11, 2013 |
Final release | XE23 / June 20, 2017 |
Marketing target | Augmented Reality |
Available in | Multi-lingual |
Update method | FoTA |
Platforms | 32-bit ARM |
Kernel type | Monolithic (modified Linux kernel) |
License | Developer Preview: proprietary[3] Apache License 2.0 Linux kernel patches under GNU GPL v2[4] |
Official website | www |
Glass OS (Google XE) was a version of Google's Android operating system designed for Google Glass. "glass-omap" Tag is used in referring to the modified Android code which can be found inside Kernel Repository.[5] Glass OS was discontinued on June 20, 2017.[6]
The following list shows the main changes happened for each update release.[7] For more detailed release notes visit the support website.
Initial release.
XE5 updates included:[8]
XE6 updates include:[9]
Glass was updating by itself automatically over the air. Glass was checking Google servers periodically for updates. When an update was available, Glass was downloading it to the device and was installing the update all by itself. That was happening under the condition of active battery charging and a reliable Wi-Fi connection.[10]
The preferred license for the Android Open Source Project is the Apache Software License, 2.0. ... Why Apache Software License? ... For userspace (that is, non-kernel) software, we do in fact prefer ASL2.0 (and similar licenses like BSD, MIT, etc.) over other licenses such as LGPL. Android is about freedom and choice. The purpose of Android is promote openness in the mobile world, but we don't believe it's possible to predict or dictate all the uses to which people will want to put our software. So, while we encourage everyone to make devices that are open and modifiable, we don't believe it is our place to force them to do so. Using LGPL libraries would often force them to do so.