In today's world, Dianchungosaurus has taken a leading role in society, generating a significant impact in different areas of daily life. Since its emergence, Dianchungosaurus has generated endless debates, criticisms, and reflections, becoming a topic of interest for different sectors and disciplines. Its influence has transcended borders and has become a fundamental part in decision-making, in the construction of identity, in the development of technology, and in the creation of new forms of communication. In this article, we will explore the many facets of Dianchungosaurus and its relevance in contemporary society.
Dianchungosaurus Temporal range: Early Jurassic,
| |
---|---|
Scientific classification ![]() | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Class: | Reptilia |
Clade: | Archosauria |
Clade: | Pseudosuchia |
Clade: | Crocodylomorpha |
Clade: | Crocodyliformes |
Genus: | †Dianchungosaurus Young, 1982 |
Species: | †D. lufengensis
|
Binomial name | |
†Dianchungosaurus lufengensis Young, 1982
| |
Synonyms | |
Dianchungosaurus (meaning "Dianchung lizard"[1]) is an extinct genus of mesoeucrocodylian crocodyliform from the Early Jurassic of China. It was previously considered a dinosaur, but it was recently reclassified as a mesoeucrocodylian by Paul Barrett and Xing Xu (2005).[2] It is probably the same animal as the informally named "Tianchungosaurus".[1] The type species is D. lufengensis and it was described in 1982.[1] A second species, D. elegans, was named in 1986,[3] but it has since become a synonym of the type species.[2]
Two specimens were originally referred to this taxon:[1]
Both remains come from the Lower Lufeng Formation, near Dianchung, in the Yunnan Province in China. The age of the material is thus Sinemurian (Early Jurassic).[2]
Originally classified by Young in 1982 in Heterodontosauridae,[1] Dianchungosaurus lufengensis' affinities were doubted by some, who regarded it as a nomen dubium, but it was until recently usually considered a valid heterodontosaurid. In 2005, a paper by Barrett and Xu focused on this problematic taxon and found its specimens to form an hypodigm, a chimera of different animals. The holotype, IVPP V4735a, was reclassified as a mesoeucrocodylian, while the paratype, IVPP V4735b, was found to be an indeterminate sauropodomorph.[2]
To maintain the stability in the literature, the holotype retains the name D. lufengensis, while the paratype awaits a formal description.[2]