Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals

In this article, the topic of Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals will be addressed, which has gained great relevance in recent years due to its impact on various aspects of society. Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals is a topic that has generated interest worldwide, sparking debates and reflections in different areas. From its origins to the present, Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals has been the subject of study by experts and academics, who have sought to understand its implications and consequences. Through this article, different perspectives on Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals will be explored, as well as its relevance in the current context and its possible implications for the future.

Shortcuts
WikiProject Stub sorting
Information
Project page talk
- Stub types (sections) talk
- Stub types (full list) talk
- To do talk
- Naming conventions talk
- Redirects category talk
Wikipedia:Stub talk
Discussion
Proposals (A) talk
- Current month
Discussion talk
Criteria (A) (discontinued) talk
Deletion (Log) (discontinued) talk
Category

On this WikiProject Stub sorting subpage, you can propose new stub types (please read the procedures beforehand!), as well as the reorganization and subdivision of existing stub types. You can also discuss anything else related to stubs on the talk page.

Proposing new stub types – procedure

Important: If you wish to propose the creation of a stub ARTICLE you've come to the wrong place. If you don't have a username yourself, please go to WP:AFC for proposing a new article. If you already have a username, you can create the article yourself. If you don't know how, add {{Helpme}} to your user talk page to request help from other editors. This page only deals with stub TEMPLATES and CATEGORIES; we cannot help you with creating articles.

Proposing new stub types
If you wish to propose a new stub category and template, please follow these procedures:
  1. Check the List of stub types or under Category:Stub categories to make sure that your proposed new stub does not already exist.
  2. List it at the top of the current month's section, under a header, like the ones shown (if any). Sign it with a datestamp (~~~~).
    • Please bear in mind that a stub category isn't about the importance or notability of the topic!
  3. Find a good number of stub articles, as many as you can, that will fit that template. You may use this tool to scan through categories; tagged stubs are always in Category:All stub articles and transclude {{asbox}}. Each of these articles can be:
    • currently marked with {{stub}};
    • currently marked with another type of stub tag (in which case you should justify why your tag is better for the article than the current one);
    • a stub whose categorisation is highly ambiguous or questionable;
    • not marked as a stub.
  4. If you use any category scan (from the tool mentioned above or from any other), please link to it so that other users can confirm that the results are still accurate.
  5. Others may do the same, if they so desire.
  6. 5 days after listing it here, if there is general approval or no objection, go ahead and create the new category and/or template following the format on Wikipedia:Stub. List the new stub type on the stub types list in an appropriate section. If consensus is not clear, or discussion is still ongoing, the proposal will remain open until consensus can be reached.
  7. If you wish to propose a stub type which does not currently have 60 articles that could use it, you may propose an upmerged template in a similar way. An upmerged template would feed into currently existing stub categories until such time that there are enough stubs for a separate stub category. At that point a category for it may be separately proposed. Some times, it may be difficult to be sure how many stubs would get a tag - in which case you can also start with an upmerged stub tag until you're sure there are enough.

DO NOT place a proposal here for any stub type which has already been created and is being discussed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. The proposal page is only for stub types that have not yet been created, and it is better to keep any discussion of such stub types in one place rather than splitting it between different pages. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion is the correct page for proposals to delete a stub type.

^ Good number means about 60 articles or more, or 30 or more if it is the primary stub type of a WikiProject, though this figure may vary from case to case.

"Speedy creation"

A stub type may be proposed for "speedy creation" if it meets one of the following criteria:

  • S1 - the creation of a category for which an approved upmerged template already exists and is now in use on more than 60 articles.
  • S2 - the creation of an upmerged national-level template for a subject in which other such national-level templates currently exist (e.g., X-bio-stub, X-hist-stub, or X-geo-stub, where X is the name of an internationally widely recognised country) or other instances where a clearly established pattern of similar subtypes exists. The proposed topic may not be controversial in scope.

List speedy creation proposals in the same proposal listings as normal stub proposals below.

Proposals, December 2024

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

NEW PROPOSALS

Proposals, November 2024

Category:Mathematics organization stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
72 stubs are currently tagged with {{math-org-stub}}. jlwoodwa (talk) 09:46, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Support speedy. Her Pegship (?) 22:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Centrarchiformes stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 60 stubs. —Trilletrollet 00:07, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Acropomatiformes stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 80 stubs that need a category and template. —Trilletrollet 23:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Labriformes stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Labriformes, since there are currently over 100 stubs that could use it. The subgroup Labridae already has a stub category, so it would make sense for the order to also have one. —Trilletrollet 17:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Template:Struthioniformes-stub

9 articles that need Template:Struthioniformes-stub:

The template will add Category:Bird stubs rather than Category:Struthioniformes stubs, as there are only 9. Grey Clownfish (talk) 07:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Please have a look at the guidelines for creating new stub types; generally it isn't efficient to create a new type until there are at least 60 articles that would use the type. Her Pegship (?) 00:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Hence why I only want the template to be created, and not the category. We have stub templates for other bird orders, even if there are less than 60 pages that need them, so that's why I'm proposing these ones. Grey Clownfish (talk) 06:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:Struthioniformes and its several sub-cats contain only 32 articles, only 9 of which are stub sized (listed above), and 7 of these are already tagged as {{paleo-bird-stub}}. Personally, I don't think even a stub template is merited at this time - perhaps if the category and sub-cats show some growth/interest in the future it might be useful. Anyone else have an opinion? Her Pegship (?) 22:58, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Template:Rheiformes-stub

3 articles that need Template:Rheiformes-stub:

The template will add Category:Bird stubs rather than Category:Rheiformes stubs, as there are only 3. Grey Clownfish (talk) 07:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Please have a look at the guidelines for creating new stub types; generally it isn't efficient to create a new type until there are at least 60 articles that would use the type. Her Pegship (?) 00:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Please feel free to discuss this and other proposals at the talk page. Her Pegship (?) 23:09, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Template:Apterygiformes-stub

4 articles need Template:Apterygiformes-stub:

The template will add Category:Bird stubs rather than Category:Apterygiformes stubs, as there are only 4. Grey Clownfish (talk) 07:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Please have a look at the guidelines for creating new stub types; generally it isn't efficient to create a new type until there are at least 60 articles that would use the type. Her Pegship (?) 00:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Please feel free to discuss this and other proposals at the talk page. Her Pegship (?) 23:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Upmerge Template:Falconiformes-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was upmerged.
There are only 12 articles with Template:Falconiformes-stub, because Accipitriformes is no longer considered Falconiformes. So please get rid of Category:Falconiformes stubs and make Template:Falconformes-stub add Category:Bird stubs instead. Grey Clownfish (talk) 06:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

I have upmerged {{Falconiformes-stub}} to Category:Bird stubs as suggested. If you want Category:Falconiformes stubs to be deleted, please propose it at CfD. Her Pegship (?) 01:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Upmerge Template:Tinamiformes-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was upmerged.
Category:Tinamiformes stubs has only 15 articles. Grey Clownfish (talk) 06:27, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

I upmerged it, as I found that it was listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types/Science as upmerged, so if I didn't upmerge it, I would have to update that information on that page. Grey Clownfish (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Upmerge Template:Procellariiformes-stub

Category:Procellariiformes stubs has only 38 articles. Grey Clownfish (talk) 06:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Upmerge Template:Charadriiformes-stub

Category:Charadriiformes stubs has only 42 articles. Grey Clownfish (talk) 06:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Upmerge Template:Pelecaniformes-stub

Category:Pelecaniformes stubs has only 45 articles. Grey Clownfish (talk) 07:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Category:Acanthuriformes stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
S1: Template:Acanthuriformes-stub is used on more than 60 articles. And the subgroups Acanthuridae and Chaetodontidae already have stub categories. —Trilletrollet 01:37, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Support speedy creation of category. Her Pegship (?) 00:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Carangiformes stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
S1: Template:Carangiformes-stub is used on more than 60 articles. —Trilletrollet 01:37, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Support speedy creation of category. Her Pegship (?) 00:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, October 2024

Category:Independent record label stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have Category:United States independent record label stubs but not this logical superset. At least 261 non-American labels are tagged stubs. Mach61 13:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 21:50, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Swimming competition stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create upmerged template.
This would be a subcategory under Category:Swimming stubs. Anyone looking in that category will realize there's more than 60 stubs that would qualify to sorted under "swimming competition stubs," but that the swimming stub category wouldn't entirely be cleaned out. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:10, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, September 2024

Category:Philippines river stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Philippines-river-stub}} is currently used in 63 articles; thus, I propose a "speedy creation" (S1) of Category:Philippines river stubs (to be categorized under Category:Asia river stubs). Sanglahi86 (talk) 18:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Support speedy. Her Pegship (?) 20:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Diffuse Category:Yemen geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

1234qwer1234qwer4 19:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Support. Her Pegship (?) 20:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy creation of Category:Tanzania geography stubs subcategories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

1234qwer1234qwer4 18:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, August 2024

Freestyle album stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no consensus.

If you want to create a stub type, please propose it here. Otherwise, feel free to assign {{electronic-album-stub}} to the article in question. Her Pegship (?) 18:17, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
I did propose a stub type: freestyle album stub. Look at the header. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 04:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
@Erpert: Can you find sixty existing stub articles that would suit the proposed new stub type? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sabaragamuwa Province, Sri Lanka stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
{{SabaragamuwaLK-geo-stub}} is used on more than 60 articles, so I will create Category:Sabaragamuwa Province, Sri Lanka geography stubs, if there's no objection. Her Pegship (?) 20:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Balochistan, Pakistan constituency stubs‎

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Under the Pakistan constituency stubs category, articles related to Provincial Assembly constituencies are currently sorted into three subcategories: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa constituency stubs‎ (49 pages), Punjab, Pakistan constituency stubs‎ (515 pages), and Sindh constituency stubs‎ (238 pages). I propose creating a new category, Balochistan, Pakistan constituency stubs‎ to better organise and distinguish articles related to Balochistan, which is also a fully-fledged province.

There are at least 65 articles under Pakistan constituency stubs which are constituencies falling under the Provincial Assembly of Balochistan. Here some examples:

--Crosji (talk) 04:13, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.