Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/FriyMan

In this article we will explore everything related to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/FriyMan, from its origin and evolution to its impact on today's society. Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/FriyMan is a topic that has generated great interest and debate in different circles, whether in the academic, social or professional field. Over the years, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/FriyMan has been the subject of multiple investigations and studies that have contributed to expanding our knowledge on this topic. Furthermore, its relevance today makes it a topic of great importance for understanding the world in which we live. Throughout this article, we will examine in detail all the relevant aspects of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/FriyMan and its influence on our daily lives.

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

FriyMan

Final (0/4/0); ended 12:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination

FriyMan (talk · contribs) – I, FriyMan would like to become a Wikipedia administrator. One of the main reasons I want to gain this position, is the fact that I dedicated my wikipedia experience to anti-vandalism. I already have gained rollback rights and learned how to operate Twinkle, as well as Huggle. I have been on wikipedia for over a month and have never vandalised encyclopedia, or exploited the rollback rights I have been granted with. One of the major contributions I made was to develop Kubinka article. If I get admin rights, I would use them to stop edit wars by applying page protection as well as blocking users, who dedicate themselves to vandalising our encyclopedia. However I will never use those privileges for my own good. Thank you. FriyMan talk 11:46, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A: I plan on taking part in anti-vandalism operations and sock puppet investigations.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: One of my best contributions is probably improving Kubinka Article, because I translated info from russian wiki because I am a native russian speaker.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: I have been in an edit war a few times and I tried to resolve it by warning the user of him breaking the three revert rule. In the future, if I see this happening, I would warn him the way policies tell me to and then, if needed block him. I would however try to explain him, that his attempts to vandalise wikipedia are pointless.

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.

Discussion

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

Support


Oppose
  1. Oppose per WP:SNOW. You have been here far too short a time to gain the community's trust. That I had to reformat this RfA properly so the bot would display it correctly doesn't help your cause either. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
  2. Snow close please. Patient Zerotalk 11:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
  3. Oppose. A lot more experience needed. Axl ¤ 12:05, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
  4. Oppose Sorry, you just aren't ready yet. A snow close would be appropriate. --AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 12:07, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Neutral


General comments
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.