Wikipedia:Peer review/Pokémon Scarlet and Violet/archive1

In this article we are going to address the topic of Wikipedia:Peer review/Pokémon Scarlet and Violet/archive1, which is of utmost importance and interest to a wide spectrum of readers. Wikipedia:Peer review/Pokémon Scarlet and Violet/archive1 has become a topic of discussion and debate in recent times, being the subject of analysis by experts in the field. Through this article, we seek to provide a comprehensive and detailed view of Wikipedia:Peer review/Pokémon Scarlet and Violet/archive1, addressing its most relevant aspects and offering valuable information to understand its impact in various areas. From its origin to its current evolution, Wikipedia:Peer review/Pokémon Scarlet and Violet/archive1 has aroused the interest of professionals, academics and the general public, so it is relevant to investigate its nature and consequences. Through an analytical and rigorous approach, we aim to explore and deepen this topic, presenting diverse perspectives and arguments that enrich knowledge about Wikipedia:Peer review/Pokémon Scarlet and Violet/archive1. Without a doubt, this article aspires to be an informative and reflective reference for those who wish to fully understand this phenomenon.


I've listed this article for peer review because I want to take it to Featured Article at some point in the future, and wish to get a gauge for what more I need to add or rewrite before making a nomination. I've done a few FLs before, so I have a few ideas of what I need done, but I wished to get some more input since FA is a whole new beast for me as an editor. Please feel free to tear into any and all parts of the article with this, and all advice is appreciated!

Thanks, Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 19:34, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

LunaEclipse

I'll start a source review in 2 weeks' time. Please trout me if I don't.

This is unrelated, but I fear the admittedly funny image of Toby Fox covered in foam has to go. MOS:IMAGEREL issues have arised over its use on his article, and the same issue seems to persist here. An image of someone covered in foam is ambiguous enough to not be properly illustrative. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neostalkedits) 14:50, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

@LunaEclipse trout Any progress? Tarlby (t) (c) 16:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
fuck 💔 i'll get to this tonight — 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neostalkedits) 17:21, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

: OK

: OK

: OK

: OK

: OK

: OK

: OK

: OK

: OK

: OK

: OK

: Review does not give the game a rating

: OK

: OK

: No mention of the Pokemon being used to find tools in the aforementioned region

@Pokelego999: ping. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neostalkedits) 13:50, 27 April 2025 (UTC)