Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/UBS/1
In this article we will explore in depth the topic of Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/UBS/1, a topic that has aroused the interest and curiosity of people from different fields. From its impact on society to the implications it has on our daily lives, Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/UBS/1 is a topic that deserves to be analyzed in detail. Along these lines, we will delve into its origins, its evolution over time and the various perspectives that exist around it. Whether you are an expert in the field or simply someone interested in learning more about it, this article is intended to offer a complete and enriching overview of Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/UBS/1.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: - Delist Fails NPOV and verifiability Femke (talk) 18:48, 5 June 2022 (UTC).
Concern that the article includes unsourced content and downplays the controversies that the organization has been involved in, see the talk page for details. (t · c) buidhe 15:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment by Swiss romulus moved from the other GAR:
- This article needs serious updating. See its talk page for the details. Besides it was not properly promoted GA in the first place.. Swiss romulus (talk) 20:44, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- I agree, Swiss romulus. Since this is a community GAR it needs to be closed by an uninvolved editor, but so far there is no support for keeping it as a GA. (t · c) buidhe 00:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- I've just checked, and there's no sign that the relevant WikiProjects were notified about this GAR at the time the nomination was made; such notifications are part of the GAR process. I don't think this can be properly closed before they have been notified and given a chance to bring the article back up to GA level. buidhe, can you please take care of it? (When I was checking, I saw that you'd notified one of them about an FAR; GARs should get the same attention.) While it's much less likely that the original GA nominator and reviewer are still around, they should also be notified if they are still editing. Thank you for taking care of this. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:49, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Done (t · c) buidhe 03:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
