Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Conflict of interest reports

This page is a procedural policy developed by the Arbitration Committee in consultation with the Wikipedia community. Any significant edit to this page should have approval from the Arbitration Committee. If in doubt, consider discussing changes here.

Shortcut WP:COIVRT

This page in a nutshell: Private reports of undisclosed conflict of interest or paid editing should be sent to paid-en-wpwikipedia.org. Access to the queue is supervised by the Arbitration Committee.

Wikipedia Arbitration
About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures Conflict of interest reports
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)
Track related changes
v t e

To deal with reports of undisclosed conflict-of-interest or paid editing, where reporting such editing on-wiki would lead to posting another editor's personal information without their consent, editors can send reports to paid-en-wpwikipedia.org. These reports are handled using the volunteer response team (VRT) system by members of the CheckUser and Oversight teams, or by specially-appointed administrators. Reports may be sent to the Arbitration Committee for review at their discretion; for example, a credible report involving an administrator should be referred.

Administrators may apply for access by emailing the Committee at arbcom-en-cwikimedia.org.

1. The Committee carefully vets all applications with feedback from the functionaries team; very clear consensus from the Committee is needed for a candidate to be presented for consideration to the Community.
2. During consultation, comments concerning the candidates may be submitted publicly or privately.
3. The Committee shall review all the comments submitted and other relevant factors prior to finalising an official appointments motion to be posted to the noticeboard.
4. After confirming that the user has signed both the Wikimedia Foundation and the VRT confidentiality agreements, the Committee will submit a request to the VRT administrators to assign permission.

• July 2024
• November 2024

Current members of the CheckUser and Oversight teams automatically have access to the queue. In addition, the following administrators have access:

• 331dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
• Bilby (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
• Extraordinary Writ (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
• Robertsky (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

Queue members also have access to a mailing list, which can be used for coordination.

Blocks with rationales that depend on information from this queue must be done with a link to the ticket number in the log entry. Wikipedia:Blocking policy § Confidential evidence must be followed.

The Arbitration Committee may request that VRT admins withdraw access to the queue if it loses confidence in an editor due to abuse or violations of global privacy policies (such as inappropriately disclosing privacy-related information).

Users who cease to be administrators will lose their access, as will users who leave the CheckUser and Oversight teams unless they request otherwise. This applies where they remain as administrators.

Complaints regarding the use of the VRT queue should be emailed to the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org.

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conflict of interest management § New VRT queue established
• Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 13 § Special Circumstances Blocks