In the wide universe of topics that current society addresses, Voluntary redundancy has stood out as a topic of absolute relevance. Whether due to its impact on people's daily lives, its influence in the workplace or its historical significance, Voluntary redundancy has captured the attention of a wide audience of various ages and professions. In this article, we will explore the various facets of Voluntary redundancy, from its origins to its evolution today, with the aim of providing a global perspective on this much-discussed topic.
This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2014) |
Voluntary redundancy (VR) is a financial incentive offered by an organisation to encourage employees to voluntarily resign,[1] typically in downsizing or restructuring situations. The purpose is to avoid compulsory redundancies or layoffs.
A voluntary redundancy programme is not always driven by short term revenue goals. It can also be motivated by the strategic choice to change the age structure within the company. According to research,[citation needed] people who accept voluntary redundancy may at times return to the company after changes in the company's prospects, strategic vision, or economic climate and, in doing so, may bring new ideas.
LM Ericsson implemented a VR programme in the spring of 2006. It offered the programme to 17,000 employees in Sweden between the ages of 35 and 50. Those who voluntarily left were given between 12 and 16 months of severance, 50,000 kronor, and a course in entrepreneurship coupled with job placement services. The goal was to have a maximum of 1,000 employees volunteer for the programme.[citation needed]
Delta Air Lines, in the aftermath of its bankruptcy filing, offered a programme that included limited flight benefits for a set period after voluntary resignation. In light of rising fuel prices, it turned back to a VR programme. The particulars of that severance package are unknown.[2]