User talk:Miminity/Archives/3

This is an archive of past discussions with User talk:Miminity/Archives. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, Miminity,

You shouldn't say, on AFD #1 that your deletion rationale is on AFD #2. At the very least copy over the reason but the deletion rationale should be original. But asking AFD participants to go to a separate page to read why you are arguing for deletion for a different article is just lazy and I doubt you'll get participation. I'm not sure why you thought referring editors to Article 2's AFD to see why you think Article 1 should be deleted made sense. You don't want to have to make participants work to understand your reasons, you need to write a compelling deletion rationale based in policy that demonstrates a BEFORE has been done. It's your job as the nominator to persuasively present your argument, not ask editors to go to a different page to see why you think an article should be deleted. Please correct these nominations if you want to see any editors participating in them. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

P.S. If you are too busy with school to edit then please do not start up AFDs, you should be around to answer questions about them and respond to comments that are made by editors. You might consider withdrawing them if you don't have time now for any follow-up. You can always nominate them later. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

@Liz: oops no necessarily busy but cannot answer question immediately, but yeah okay note is taken, I'll just withdraw the other Afds Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Nvm, I just fix it. Thanks for reminding me. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:22, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

You claimed that it didn’t have reliable references, however it has some of the most reliable ones I could find. 2603:8081:15F0:67D0:652F:3772:B29D:CF55 (talk) 12:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

The article lacks inline citation to verify each information. See Help:Referencing for beginners for more information. If you need more help ask the Wikipedia:Teahouse. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:38, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

would newspaper articles from the era work? BrisanAAcomastick (talk) 00:10, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Yes, but please include an inline citation and not just put the sources on the reference section Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 01:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

The article Chiisana Koi no Uta you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Chiisana Koi no Uta for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IanTEB -- IanTEB (talk) 13:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello Miminity! I am extremely grateful for your kind review.

I mistakenly thought it was enough to add those missing references in the "External Links" section as they come from the same source, but I have added them accordingly to its corresponding entry in the "Filmography" section. I have resubmited the draft, and I would be endlessly grateful if you could give it another quick look and see if it is good now since I have added them. Thank you so much for your time and your valuable advice.

I hope you have a wonderful day! :) MoonsideYasu (talk) 18:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

@MoonsideYasu: AnimeNewsNetwork encyclopedia (see WP:ANIMENEWSNETWORK for more info) is not a reliable source (see Wikiproject Animanga online reliable source to see what's a reliable source and what is not) but I don't want to decline it, It nearly good to go, just remove it if it there is no reliable source available. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 01:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

Thank you so so much for your very quick reply during such a busy time, and also for your patience and consideration. I deeply apologize for my mistakes.

Thank you for letting me know about the AnimeNewsNetwork encyclopedia since I wasn't aware, I will definitely take it into account for my future contributions from now on. In this case, I have replaced those source references with her official blog, since they are also listed there, just not in English which is why I opted for the AnimeNewsNetwork encyclopedia but it surely is a better choice to have the source coming directly from the seiyuu herself.

It should be good to go now so I would be incredibly grateful if you could take another quick look.

Once again, thank you so much for your time and your patience. MoonsideYasu (talk) 07:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello Thank you for reviewing this draft. I am very confused by the rejection of the Draft for Draft:Seldon Charles Forrester Farmer as there are multiple accessible references to verify the information provided. People have continued to cite Seldon Farmer nearly 40 years after his death in academic and professional works. Thus it is clear he is notable even without the honour of an OBE. I have consulted the notability pages on wiki and it is clear that he is worthy of a wiki biography, with multiple news, journal, government and Royal notices in a time entirely before the internet. I would be grateful if you would reconsider or make some very specific suggestions about how this page needs to be modified. Many thanks. Zaccwm (talk) 18:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

@Zaccwm: Please read the comment I left. Majority of the sources you provided are written by the subject of the article which make it a primary source, in wikipedia we use secondary or third-party sources to verify and establish notability for a person. If you need more help, try asking Wikipedia:Teahouse. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 00:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, I will see if some of the offline sources can be made available Zaccwm (talk) 07:09, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Can you explain why you declined this for unreliable sources? These sources appear to be academic books. -- asilvering (talk) 02:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

@Asilvering: I decline it as majority of the info on "Divisions" are heavily uncited. It's good enough, but it's not properly uncited and as well as the issue you tagged it. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 02:56, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Almost everything on this article is cited, so I've accepted it to mainspace. We should only be using the WP:V decline like that when it's a huge problem - ie, something you can't fix in normal editing. If it's just a bit, you can delete it yourself and accept. In this case, the stuff under "divisions" is sourced, just not with footnotes, so it's fine (though of course we'd prefer to see footnotes). For example, the Takamiya chronology is sourced to Hiroe Takamiya. It would take some work to follow up on that reference, but it's good enough to get a pass and a maintenance tag. -- asilvering (talk) 03:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Noted, thanks for informing me! I just started reviewing draft yesterday. But, yeah, in retrospect, I should've just made a comment about the issue. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 03:06, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for helping out! -- asilvering (talk) 03:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

but yeah, I think I just commented on it not full blown declined it. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 03:00, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi Miminity, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:56, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Miminity, you appear to be reviewing pages at quite a swift pace for NPP. I am concerned that you're not giving each page the full attention that is required per the guidelines at WP:NPP. For example, Franco Spitale does not appear to have enough sourcing in article to confirm notability. Did you conduct a search for searches to determine if he is in fact notable? Likewise, I tagged Hip Hop Macedonia for both notability and potential COI editing. There are clearly concerns there that ought to be addressed before marking the article patrolled. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

@Voorts: I conducted searches ever page I review to determine how it is said in WP:NPPHOUR, about the Franco Spitale, I forgotten to tag it with notability but I personally think it is notable as he won a world competition but honestly it's learning me toward only weak keep. and about the Hip Hop Macedonia, I thought for tagging it for WP:AfD. But NOTE TAKEN, I might slow down a little bit and I personally think I misunderstood the NPP workflow. so thanks for letting me know. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 03:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Miminity: the key tasks of NPP are (1) checking for COPYVIO and (2) checking for notability. Both of those tasks take time. If you're not sure that something is notable, do not mark it as patrolled. For example, you should not have marked Franco Spitale as patrolled since you were going to tag it with {{notability}}, as that template indicates that notability of an article is uncertain.

At this point, I would recommend that you re-read the instructions, wait a day, re-read them again, and then take things very slowly. You should also re-check the pages that you have already marked as patrolled and mark them as unpatrolled if you are not certain about their notability. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:15, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Sure, thanks for telling me! Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi, legia.net isn't a primary source, that would be legia.com which is official website of the club. Marcelus (talk) 06:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Noted, Thanks for telling me. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 07:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello. Per the notice you received above, a tag had been placed on Irish twins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. Please note that after review, I have removed the deletion request on the basis that having examined the deleted article, I find that the present page is not "substantially identical" within the meaning of WP:CSD#G4., so you do not need to worry about this page being speedily deleted. However, speedy deletion is not the only deletion processes on Wikipedia; my removal does not prevent users from invoking other, longer term deletion methods, such as for an article, proposing its deletion or nominating it at articles for deletion. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Noted It's okay. I just thought It was the same so I tagged it Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 00:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

I just made changes to the article: Draft:Thierry Rayer - Wikipedia

here are my different points to highlight in relation to my article

1. Forbes France : Forbes is an internationally recognized publication specializing in economic and financial topics. His reputation in the field of business and entrepreneurship is well established. In France, Forbes follows rigorous editorial guidelines ; Forbes France is a local franchise of Forbes International, whose journalistic standards and publishing methodologies are recognized worldwide.
2. Entreprendre.fr  : This site is dedicated to entrepreneurship and publishes economic analyses, portraits of entrepreneurs, and market studies. The site is followed by a large number of professionals and business leaders.Entreprendre.fr is a specialized and recognized platform in its field, targeting a qualified audience.
3. Arab News : Founded in 1975, Arab News is one of the leading English-language newspapers in the Middle East region, recognized for its coverage of international, economic, and political news. o Its status as a publication with a large international readership and its importance in regional analyzes reinforces its reliability.
4. Khaleej Times : Khaleej Times is one of the oldest English-language newspapers in the UAE, with a long history of covering economic, social and political affairs from the Gulf and beyond. o This regional publication's reputation, journalistic experience and influence make it a credible source for information regarding the Gulf and surrounding regions.
5. UNESCO : UNESCO is an officially recognized international organization and part of the United Nations. UNESCO publications are based on rigorous research and scientific methodologies. UNESCO is a reference institution for educational, cultural and scientific issues, widely cited in academic publications.
6. Ministères français (Finances, Europe et Affaires étrangères) : Ministries are official government sources. Information from these institutions is based on official data and is often cited as undisputed references. Data or reports from French ministries are used by many international and academic institutions as first-rate sources.
7. Chambre de Commerce France-UAE : The France-UAE CCI is a major institutional player in commercial relations between France and the Emirates. Its reports and publications are based on reliable statistics and validated economic analyses. Chambers of Commerce, as official economic actors, produce information used by businesses and governments.
8. Le Louvre (Paris) : The Louvre Museum in Paris is one of the most prestigious and influential museums in the world. It houses thousands of renowned works of art, and its publications, catalogs and reports are recognized for their scientific rigor. The Louvre's research and publications are often carried out in collaboration with international experts and academicians, which guarantees exceptional quality of the information and analyzes disseminated. • Additionally, the Louvre is a governmental cultural institution in France, which further strengthens its legitimacy.
9. Le Louvre Abu Dhabi : Louvre Abu Dhabi, in partnership with France and supported by the government of the United Arab Emirates, is a major cultural institution in the Arab world. It was founded as part of an intergovernmental agreement and is recognized for its ambition to bring together works of art and artifacts representative of world history and cultures. • Louvre Abu Dhabi's exhibitions and publications are carefully selected and validated by committees of international experts, which guarantees their reliability and relevance. • Like its Parisian counterpart, the Louvre Abu Dhabi is also involved in educational and academic projects, thus strengthening the credibility of its publications as reference sources for Wikipedia. Cultural and Academic Impact
10. For the Louvre and the Louvre Abu Dhabi: • Their role in research: The two museums are at the heart of much academic research and are often cited in journals specializing in art history, archeology and anthropology. • Their international reach: They collaborate with other world-renowned institutions, thereby increasing the reliability and accuracy of the information they publish. • Their educational importance: These museums play a key role in artistic and cultural education through programs, traveling exhibitions, and educational publications. In summary, the Louvre and Louvre Abu Dhabi are major cultural institutions whose credibility is firmly established in the academic and artistic world.
11. Reputation and Traceability : Their reliability is based on : • Their history: These publications generally have decades of experience in their field. • Their rigorous methodology: These sources use strict editorial approaches, fact-checking and transparent methodologies. • Their institutional recognition: Many academic, governmental institutions and private companies rely on these sources to obtain reliable informatio

Inspiringflow (talk) 13:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

@Inspiringflow: I decline your article because:

• a. Biography and Contributions and Activities is uncited
• b. there is a lot of external link in the body of the article which is against Wikipedia policy (see WP:NOELBODY)
• c. The article's tone sounds like you are promoting the subject.

Please satisfy this given problems before the article is moved to the mainspace. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

I just removed the external link in a separate section in the article, can you review the article again? in order to help me resolve the other remaining problems. Regarding Biography and contributions and activity, I have just put the references, please review this for me in order to help me resolve the remaining problems if there are any 'has yet. Inspiringflow (talk) 15:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

And also excuse me for the tone of the article, I added a bad link, it has already been corrected Inspiringflow (talk) 15:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello Miminity,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Władysław Słowiński for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Władysław Słowiński to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

@MPGuy2824: Thanks for tagging it. But, Forgatten to tag it with CSD. Thanks. Also for the record, I Draftify the article which is not mine. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 14:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

No problem. Try to tag it with CSD-R2 next time. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:32, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Sure! Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 14:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)