In this article we are going to address the issue of United States v. Harris, which has gained great relevance in recent years. United States v. Harris is a topic that has aroused the interest of experts and the general public, due to its impact on various areas of society. Throughout this article we will explore different aspects of United States v. Harris, from its origins to its current implications. Likewise, we will analyze the different perspectives and approaches that have been developed around this topic, in order to offer a broad and complete vision of United States v. Harris. Without a doubt, this is an exciting topic that promises to generate an enriching debate and shed light on fundamental issues for understanding current reality.
United States v. Harris | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Decided January 22, 1883 | |
Full case name | United States v. R. G. Harris, et al. |
Citations | 106 U.S. 629 (more) 1 S. Ct. 601; 27 L. Ed. 290; 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1595 |
Holding | |
Local governments, not the federal government, have the power to penalize crimes such as assault and murder. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Woods, joined by Waite, Miller, Field, Bradley, Mathews, Gray, Blatchford |
Dissent | Harlan (on the question of jurisdiction; no opinion on the merits) |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. Amend. XIV Section 2 of the Third Enforcement Act |
United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883), or the Ku Klux Case, was a case in which the US Supreme Court held that it was unconstitutional for the federal government to penalize crimes such as assault and murder in most circumstances.[1] The Court declared that only state governments have the power to penalize those crimes.
In the specific case, four men were removed from a Crockett County, Tennessee, jail by a group led by Sheriff R. G. Harris and 19 others. The four men were beaten, and one was killed. A deputy sheriff tried to prevent the act but failed.
Section 2 of the Force Act of 1871 was declared unconstitutional on the theory that an Act to enforce the Equal Protection Clause applied only to state actions, not individuals' actions.