In this article we have decided to focus on the exciting world of The Lady and the Duke. From its origins to the present, The Lady and the Duke has been the subject of interest and debate in different areas. Over the years, The Lady and the Duke has generated countless opinions and theories that have contributed to enriching our knowledge on this topic. In this sense, we propose to explore in depth the different aspects that make The Lady and the Duke such a fascinating topic, addressing both its history and its relevance today. Through a detailed and contextualized analysis, we hope to offer the reader a complete and enlightening approach to The Lady and the Duke, providing new perspectives and keys to understanding its importance in today's world.
The Lady and the Duke | |
---|---|
![]() Theatrical release poster | |
French | L'Anglaise et le Duc |
Directed by | Éric Rohmer |
Screenplay by | Éric Rohmer |
Based on | Ma vie sous la révolution by Grace Elliott |
Produced by | Françoise Etchegaray |
Starring | |
Cinematography | Diane Baratier |
Edited by | Mary Stephen |
Music by | Jean-Claude Valero |
Production companies |
|
Distributed by |
|
Release dates |
|
Running time | 129 minutes |
Countries |
|
Language | French |
Budget | €6 million[1] ($7.1 million) |
Box office | $1.1 million[2] |
The Lady and the Duke (French: L'Anglaise et le Duc, lit. 'The Englishwoman and the Duke') is a 2001 historical, dystopian, and romantic drama film, set during the Reign of Terror. It was written and directed by French New Wave filmmaker Éric Rohmer, and adapted from the memoirs Ma vie sous la révolution (Journal of My Life During the French Revolution) by Grace Elliott.
According to a description of the film in The Guardian, Rohmer's "customary verbal sparring and complex intellectual arguments are spiced by lavish sets, suspenseful plotting and the continuous threat of violence."[3]
Grace Elliott, a Scottish courtesan and the former mistress to both the Prince Regent and the Duke of Orléans, finds herself living in an increasingly dystopian and Orwellian Paris following the French Revolution. As her outspokenly Royalist beliefs place her friendship increasingly at risk with the pro-Jacobin Duke, Elliott decides during the September Massacres to aid the escape of condemned political prisoner Marquis de Champcenetz, the former governor of Tuileries Palace, at great personal risk. She also seeks to convince her former lover to take a public moral stand in the National Assembly against Robespierre and the escalation of the Reign of Terror.
The film received praise for its use of digital technology to recreate 18th-century Paris, but was also attacked in France for its graphic violence and harsh criticism of revolutionary terror and some even accused the film of being aristocratic propaganda.[4] Asked about this, Lucy Russell remarked: "There does seem to be a great problem, not just in France, but every country has problems facing up to the nasty parts of its history. But there's a reason it was called the Terror."[3]