Nowadays, The Foolish Virgin is a topic that has caught the attention of many people around the world. Whether due to its impact on society, its relevance in history, or its influence on popular culture, The Foolish Virgin is a topic that continues to generate interest and debate. In this article, we will explore in depth the different facets of The Foolish Virgin, from its origins to its current impact. We will analyze how The Foolish Virgin has evolved over time and how it has influenced different aspects of everyday life. From its historical roots to its relevance today, The Foolish Virgin continues to be an exciting topic that deserves our attention and reflection.
The Foolish Virgin | |
---|---|
![]() Lobby card | |
Directed by | George W. Hill |
Written by | Lois Zellner |
Based on | The Foolish Virgin: A Romance of Today by Thomas Dixon Jr. |
Starring | Elaine Hammerstein |
Cinematography | Norbert Brodine |
Distributed by | Columbia Pictures |
Release date |
|
Running time | 6 reels |
Country | United States |
Language | Silent (English intertitles) |
The Foolish Virgin is a lost[1] 1924 American silent romantic drama film released by Columbia Pictures. It was directed by George W. Hill and stars Elaine Hammerstein.[2] It is based on the 1915 novel The Foolish Virgin: A Romance of Today by Thomas Dixon Jr. This is the second known adaptation of the novel; the first was released in 1916.[3]
Jim Owens (Frazer) rescues Mary Adams (Hammerstein) from a scheming lawyer. Jim is successful inventor, however Mary is unaware that he has a history as a thief before they met. They fall in love and get married. Mary leaves Jim when she discovers his criminal history. In the end Jim rescues Mary and their child from a forest fire, renewing Mary's love for Jim. The 1924 plot notably differs from the book and the 1916 film. In the earlier versions Jim's thievery continued during the marriage, and only he reformed his ways after losing Mary.[4][3]
While Variety magazine in 1924 wrote that "It should please the average audience", in 1925 Photoplay magazine described The Foolish Virgin as "silly, uninteresting, tiresome".[3]