Template talk:ISO standards

Nowadays, Template talk:ISO standards is a topic that has captured the attention and interest of many people around the world. From ancient times to the modern era, Template talk:ISO standards has played a significant role in history, culture, and society. As society continues to evolve, Template talk:ISO standards remains relevant and continues to generate debate and discussion in different areas. In this article, we will explore the importance and impact of Template talk:ISO standards, as well as its influence on various areas of daily life.

I changed the numbering

The template was grouped by

  • 1-9k
  • 10k-20k
  • 20k-

but I changed it to say

  • 1 to 9999
  • 10000 to 19999
  • 20000+

It looks a little uglier but it is more correct. Jason Quinn (talk) 20:13, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

There may be some merit in splitting the numbers up the same was as in the List of International Organization for Standardization standards article, for the sake of consistency, ie:
    • 1-999
    • 1000-9999
    • 10000-19999
    • 20000-29999
    • 30000-39999
    • 40000+ (This doesn't match the article, which only has 80000)
Mitch Ames (talk) 04:39, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Adding ISO 21500 Guidance for Project Management

I am writing several articles on project management as part of the ASCE Body of Knowledge project ( or ASCE BoK) as well as the Project Management Institute Body of Knowledge project ( or PM BoK). ISO cites and parallels a lot of the materials.... Thanks ...

Risk Engineer (talk) 17:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2019

Include ISO 26262 Standard in the list (https://en.wikipedia.orghttps://scientiaen.com/ISO_26262) Cynosure1 (talk) 23:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

ย Done โ€“ Jonesey95 (talk) 07:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

WP:BRINT for 14496-10

Can we get 14496-10 updated for WP:BRINT? The article seems to have been renamed. It should link directly to Advanced Video Coding (avoiding the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC redirect). Thank you. 50.53.23.14 (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

ย Done ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿค๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿบ๐ช๐‘ค๐’†๐“‡๐Ÿท๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿœ๐“บ๐”ด๐•–๐–—๐Ÿฐ (๐—๐—ฎ๐˜ญ๐™ ) 22:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
@1234qwer1234qwer4: Thank you. 50.53.23.14 (talk) 23:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Can we get 23090-3 added? It should link to Versatile Video Coding. This can be seen at MPEG-I โ€” MPEG. Thank you. 50.53.23.14 (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

The page you linked does not mention the standard, so I don't know if this should be done yet. ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿค๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿบ๐ช๐‘ค๐’†๐“‡๐Ÿท๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿœ๐“บ๐”ด๐•–๐–—๐Ÿฐ (๐—๐—ฎ๐˜ญ๐™ ) 22:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
@1234qwer1234qwer4: Well if you won't take that one how about this one which certainly means it is published ("Stage: 60.00 (Under publication)" as of 2021-01-20): https://www.iso.org/standard/73022.html 50.53.23.14 (talk) 22:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
ย Done ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿค๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿบ๐ช๐‘ค๐’†๐“‡๐Ÿท๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿœ๐“บ๐”ด๐•–๐–—๐Ÿฐ (๐—๐—ฎ๐˜ญ๐™ ) 12:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)