Template talk:IBM operating systems

In today's world, Template talk:IBM operating systems has become a topic of great importance and interest to a wide variety of people. From its impact on society to its relevance in politics and economics, Template talk:IBM operating systems has managed to capture the attention of experts and fans alike. Whether due to its influence on popular culture or its significance in the academic field, Template talk:IBM operating systems has generated a debate in which individuals of all ages and backgrounds actively participate. As Template talk:IBM operating systems continues to evolve and take on new nuances, the need to understand it in all its complexity becomes even more evident. In this article, we will explore various facets of Template talk:IBM operating systems and its impact on contemporary society.

Red Hat OSes

@Brianreading:: given that other OSes that IBM didn't originally develop (PC-DOS, z/Linux, the Digital Research Concurrent DOS/FlexOS-based 4680 OS and 4690 OS) are listed here, RHEL and Fedora could also go here.

But does Fedora belong in the "Projects" section? Yes, it's produced by the "Fedora Project", but, unlike the other OSes there, it's neither a researchy project like K42, nor a project that eventually became part of mainstream Linux like Project Trillian, nor a project that was intended to be a commercial OS but that never came to fruition, like the others - it's very much a live, separate Linux distribution used in the real world. I might put it in the "Server, mainframe" and "Desktop, workstation" categories. Guy Harris (talk) 03:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

@Guy Harris: Your logic is sound. I support your edit if you'd like to make it. Brian Reading (talk) 15:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Done. I also linked "Fedora" to Fedora (operating system). Guy Harris (talk) 18:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)