Template talk:FreeBSD
In today's article we are going to talk about Template talk:FreeBSD, a topic that has gained great relevance in recent years and is of interest to a large number of people. Template talk:FreeBSD is a topic that has generated debate and has been the subject of study and research, since its impact covers different areas of society. From its origin to its evolution, Template talk:FreeBSD has captured the attention of experts and fans, who seek to understand its complexity and its influence on our daily lives. Throughout this article we will explore the most relevant aspects of Template talk:FreeBSD, as well as its importance in various areas of modern life. Join us and discover everything you need to know about Template talk:FreeBSD!
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the FreeBSD template. |
|
notable subsytem missed
There should be a reference to Netgraph in the list of notable subsystems - it is more known than e.g. busdma. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.188.94.125 (talk) 11:19, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Forgetting DflyBSD?
Have you guys forgotten about DragonflyBSD? It's one of the major BSDs, and based on FreeBSD! — Preceding unsigned comment added by NuclearWizard (talk • contribs) 19:36, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 5 March 2017
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I don't see a need for FreeBSD's template to be protected, there is nothing on the talk page that implies it should be.
Edit requests: Add and
Not done: From the log, the page was protected due to a request at WP:RFPP. You may use WP:RFPP to request it be unprotected. Vita and Switch are already listed in the template. RudolfRed (talk) 20:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Separate current derivatives from discontinued ones?
I think it would be nice to sort out the discontinued/historical derivatives from the ones that are still current. I don't know whether the dead ones should still be sub-grouped into open/proprietary or just all lumped together, but either way I think it would be handy for the reader.Nlburgin (talk) 21:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)