Template talk:Fred Frith

This article will address the topic of Template talk:Fred Frith, which has gained relevance in recent years due to its impact on different aspects of society. Different perspectives related to Template talk:Fred Frith will be explored, from its origins to its influence today. The importance of understanding and analyzing Template talk:Fred Frith will be examined to better understand its significance in today's world. In addition, the challenges and opportunities that Template talk:Fred Frith presents will be discussed, as well as the possible solutions that arise to address the challenges it represents. In short, this article seeks to offer a broad and enriching vision of Template talk:Fred Frith, with the aim of encouraging reflection and debate around this topic.

Naked City

Doesn't Naked City deserve a higher rung in the "bands" section? - Steve3849 talk 06:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

To answer my own question I see the first tier are all early bands, the second tier are bands he led and thus leaving the third tier. Naked City is most often thought of a John Zorn and then guitar (Frith's forte) is Bill Frisell. Still, his contribution there is noteworthy... maybe the third rung could be a larger font size? - Steve3849 talk 06:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Tiers one and two are for bands Frith led or was a founding member of, tier one being those bands he is best known for. The third tier is for other bands he was simply a member of, like John Zorn's Naked City, and hence the smaller font. --Bruce1ee 10:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Collaborating artists

I've removed "Collaborating artists" from the template. Frith has collaborated with many artists and even if we include only the prominent ones, it would still be a long list. I don't know of any other musician templates that use "Collaborating artists" and, particularly because of the number of possible entries here, I feel it's better to leave it off. —Bruce1eetalk 12:22, 30 May 2012 (UTC)