Template talk:Citation Style 1
 | Reliability | |||
| ||||
Cite arXiv
{{Cite arXiv}} is not bot-filled? ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 02:27, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
No.Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 02:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)ReplyCite hdl
{{Cite hdl}} uses {{citation}}, thus is is not CS1. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 02:28, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm. The first instance at {{Cite hdl/10068.2F257965}} uses {{citation}}, but a sample of the rest use {{cite journal}}. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 02:34, 20 May 2012 (UTC)ReplyCite pmc
Would someone please explain {{cite pmc}}? The doc page shows nothing about being deprecated or the bot status. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 00:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
The citation bot does not work with them anymore (in fact it destroys them mindlessly). You can look at the citation bot page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Citation_bot Also, it is unused. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Cite_pmc&limit=500 AManWithNoPlan (talk) 02:24, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
OK. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 15:28, 21 May 2012 (UTC)ReplyTemplate-protected edit request on 27 February 2019
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add ; {{tl|cite ChemRxiv}} : ] preprints
Sharouser (talk) 09:44, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Not done: ChemRxiv is not a supported CitationClass in Module:Citation/CS1, so it should not be listed as its own template on the list of CS1 templates. I have started a documentation page for the template that you have created; you should create some test cases and document how the template should be used. – Jonesey95 (talk) 09:57, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Cite ssrn and Cite citeseerx
Should {{Cite ssrn}} and {{Cite citeseerx}} be added to this template, or not? Debresser (talk) 17:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
yes. done. —Trappist the monk (talk) 17:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply Much appreciated. Debresser (talk) 19:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply