In today's article we are going to delve into the fascinating world of Template talk:Bryant Park. We will explore its origins, its evolution over time and its impact on today's society. Template talk:Bryant Park has been the subject of study and controversy, and throughout this article, we will try to shed light on its most relevant aspects. From its beginnings to the present, Template talk:Bryant Park has played a crucial role in different areas, and it is essential to understand its trajectory to understand its relevance today. Join us on this journey to unravel the secrets and mysteries of Template talk:Bryant Park.
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
This template is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
This template is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
@Another Believer: I don't have a terribly strong opinion either. However, I figured that if we're using the artwork name for some public artworks, we might as well be consistent in using it for all public artworks, whether statue or bust, etc. Ergo Sum17:25, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Ergo Sum, Well, I am in the process of moving many bust/statue articles per recent discussions at WikiProject Sculpture: manual of style. The entries with specific titles should remain italicized, otherwise I suggest we keep the page titles with "bust of" and "statue of" because this gives readers more info than just a name. Happy to keep discussing, but since you don't feel strongly, I am going to make a change and lemme know what you think. ---Another Believer(Talk)17:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
