Template talk:BAE Systems evolution

In today's world, Template talk:BAE Systems evolution has become increasingly important in different aspects of daily life. Whether in the personal, professional or social sphere, Template talk:BAE Systems evolution has become a fundamental element that influences our decisions, opinions and actions. Over time, Template talk:BAE Systems evolution has evolved and acquired new dimensions, leading us to reflect on its impact on society and the development of humanity. In this article, we will explore the different facets of Template talk:BAE Systems evolution and analyze its relevance in various contexts, as well as its role in shaping our world today.

GEC

Unless we are going to include all the non-aircraft elements in this template, I tihnk we should lose GEC from the pre GEC-Marconi part. At the moment the start of the timelines are all the aircraft companies except GEC.GraemeLeggett 10:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I think it belongs there for 2 reasons;
  1. GEC became a large shareholder in BAC upon purchase of EE
  2. GEC-Marconi was in the aeronautics sector, although at the electronic end of things. Without it, BAE Systems appears just as a rebrand of BAe, this shows that it is a merger of 2 sets of interests. Perhaps this is what caused some upset over at WP:AIRCRAFT, where it was seen as more of a BAE Systems timeline rather than an general aircraft company timeline, I had just hoped to kill 2 birds with one template-shaped stone.
Emoscopes Talk 10:26, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
I agree with Emoscopes. You can't include BAC without mentioning GEC (I think I read GEC couldn't care less about BAC, it just wanted EE, but that's irrelevant). And if we're talking about BAE Systems, to ignore GEC-Marconi/MES is not logical. Mark83 18:01, 22 March 2007 (UTC)