In this article we are going to explore Template talk:Artiodactyla from different angles and perspectives. Template talk:Artiodactyla is a topic that has been the subject of debate and reflection throughout history, generating conflicting opinions and awakening the interest of experts and fans alike. In this sense, we will delve into the various dimensions of Template talk:Artiodactyla, analyzing its impact on society, its relevance in the academic field, its influence on popular culture, among other aspects. Through this exploration, we aim to offer a comprehensive vision of Template talk:Artiodactyla, delving into its meaning, its implications and its place within contemporary reality.
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
The Tibetan antelope has its own subfamily, yet still appears duplicated in our template within the subfamily Antilopinae, and, furthermore, within the Saigini tribe with the Saiga.
This poor Chiru needs our attention.
Misha Vargas (talk) 04:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
And the pages for the Blue Duiker and Maxwell's Duiker both put them in a separate genus in Cephalophinae from the rest of the Duikers, yet the template plops them right in with Cephalophus. We have no consistency or thought put into this, it seems to me.
Misha Vargas (talk) 11:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
??? Pueblo89 (talk) 12:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Fix "Dicolytes" to "Dicotyles" 192.236.64.165 (talk) 22:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)