Talk:China Today

In today's article we will explore Talk:China Today, a topic that has generated great interest and controversy in recent times. Since its appearance, Talk:China Today has been the subject of debate and discussion in different areas, generating conflicting opinions and raising questions about its true impact. Throughout the article we will analyze different aspects related to Talk:China Today, from its origin and evolution to its influence on current society. Without a doubt, Talk:China Today is a relevant topic that deserves to be addressed carefully to understand its scope and impact in today's world.

Untitled

Does anyone know the source of this website (www.chinatoday.com)? Thanks --Dpr 15:10, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

No idea. It does not seem to share the impeccable English, reliance on staff reporters, and in-depth human-interest and "behind the news" style typical of the magazine. — Pekinensis 15:31, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
Interestingly, it's one of the top hits on a Google search for keyword "China". --Dpr 06:05, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

"China Today, formerly entitled China Reconstructs" - When was the name change? - 30 November 2005

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on China Today. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:44, 5 August 2017 (UTC)