This article will address SOS box, a topic of great relevance in the current context. SOS box has aroused great interest in various areas, since its impact is felt in numerous spheres of society. Over the years, SOS box has acquired increasing importance, which has motivated the interest of academics, professionals and experts in the field. In this sense, it is essential to thoroughly analyze and understand SOS box, in order to be able to identify its implications and consequences. Therefore, throughout this article different aspects related to SOS box will be explored, from its origin to its influence today.
LexA binds to an SOS box in the absence of DNA damage. In the presence of DNA damage the binding of LexA is inactivated by the RecAactivator. SOS boxes differ in DNA sequences and binding affinity towards LexA from organism to organism.[2] Furthermore, SOS boxes may be present in a dual fashion, which indicates that more than one SOS box can be within the same promoter.[3]
^Henkin, Tina M.; Peters, Joseph E. (2020). Snyder and Champness molecular genetics of bacteria (Fifth ed.). Hoboken, NJ : Washington, D.C: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 409. ISBN9781555819750.
^Walker, Graham C. (October 1995). "SOS-regulated proteins in translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis". Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 20 (10): 416–20. doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(00)89091-x. PMID8533155.
^Tapias, A.; Barbé, J. (August 1999). "Regulation of divergent transcription from the uvrA-ssb promoters in Sinorhizobium meliloti". Molecular and General Genetics MGG. 262 (1): 121–130. doi:10.1007/s004380051066. PMID10503543. S2CID2373618.
^Mazón, G.; Lucena, J. M.; Campoy, S.; Fernández de Henestrosa, A. R.; Candau, P.; Barbé, J. (February 2004). "LexA-binding sequences in Gram-positive and cyanobacteria are closely related". Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 271 (1): 40–49. doi:10.1007/s00438-003-0952-x. PMID14652736. S2CID9219764.