The topic of Polyptoton is one that has generated debate and interest for a long time. From its origins to its relevance today, Polyptoton has been the object of study, analysis and discussion in different fields of knowledge. With the evolution of society and technological advances, the role of Polyptoton has taken on new dimensions and has acquired different meanings. In this article, we will explore the many facets of Polyptoton and its impact on various aspects of everyday life. From its influence on popular culture to its relevance in the scientific field, Polyptoton remains an intriguing topic that deserves to be explored in depth.
Polyptoton /ˌpɒlɪpˈtoʊtɒn/ is the stylistic scheme in which different words derived from the same root (such as "strong" and "strength") are used together. A related stylistic device is antanaclasis, in which the same word is repeated, but each time with a different sense.[1] Another related term is figura etymologica.[2]
In inflected languages (such as Latin), polyptoton is the repetition of a word in different grammatical cases. One example of this can be found in the Latin forms of the Roman deity Jupiter, or "Iuppiter". The word appears in various cases as follows: "Iuppiter" (nominative), "Iovem" (accusative), "Iovis" (genitive), "Iovi" (dative), and "Iove" (ablative).
The form is relatively common in Latin Christian poetry and prose in a construction called the superlative genitive, in phrases such as sanctum sanctorum ("holy of holies"), and found its way into languages such as Old English, which naturally preferred the prevalent alliteration that is part and parcel of polyptoton—in fact, polyptoton is "much more prevalent in Old English verse than in Latin verse." The specific superlative genitive in Old English, however, occurs only in Latinate Christian poems, not in secular poetry.[3]
It is also used in public speaking, and several examples can be found in Churchill's speeches.[4]
G. K. Chesterton frequently employed this device to create paradox:
It is the same with all the powerful of to-day; it is the same, for instance, with the high-placed and high-paid official. Not only is the judge not judicial, but the arbiter is not even arbitrary.
— G.K. Chesterton, The Man on Top (1912)[5]
In combination with verbal active and passive voices, it points out the idea of a latent reciprocity:
Judge not, that ye be not judged
— Matthew 7:1[6]
An alternative way to use the device is to develop polyptoton over the course of an entire novel, which is done in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Shelley combines polyptoton with periphrastic naming, which is the technique of referring to someone using several indirect names. The creature in Frankenstein is referred to by many terms, such as "fiend", "devil", "being", and "ogre". However, the first term that Shelley uses in reference to the creature is "wretch". Throughout the novel, various forms of this are used, such as "wretchedly" and "wretchedness", which may be seen as polyptoton. According to Duyfhuizen, the gradual development of polyptoton in Frankenstein is significant because it symbolizes the intricacies of one's own identity.[7]