Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon equations

General relativity
${\displaystyle G_{\mu \nu }+\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }={\kappa }T_{\mu \nu }}$
Introduction History Timeline Tests Mathematical formulation
Fundamental concepts Equivalence principle Special relativity World line Pseudo-Riemannian manifold
Phenomena Kepler problem Gravitational lensing Gravitational redshift Gravitational time dilation Gravitational waves Frame-dragging Geodetic effect Event horizon Singularity Black hole Spacetime Spacetime diagrams Minkowski spacetime Einstein–Rosen bridge
Equations Formalisms Equations Linearized gravity Einstein field equations Friedmann Geodesics Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon Hamilton–Jacobi–Einstein Formalisms ADM BSSN Post-Newtonian Advanced theory Kaluza–Klein theory Quantum gravity
Solutions Schwarzschild (interior) Reissner–Nordström Einstein–Rosen waves Wormhole Gödel Kerr Kerr–Newman Kerr–Newman–de Sitter Kasner Lemaître–Tolman Taub–NUT Milne Robertson–Walker Oppenheimer–Snyder pp-wave van Stockum dust Weyl−Lewis−Papapetrou Hartle–Thorne
Scientists Einstein Lorentz Hilbert Poincaré Schwarzschild de Sitter Reissner Nordström Weyl Eddington Friedmann Milne Zwicky Lemaître Oppenheimer Gödel Wheeler Robertson Bardeen Walker Kerr Chandrasekhar Ehlers Penrose Hawking Raychaudhuri Taylor Hulse van Stockum Taub Newman Yau Thorne others
Physics portal  Category
v t e

In physics, specifically general relativity, the Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon equations describe the motion of a massive spinning body moving in a gravitational field. Other equations with similar names and mathematical forms are the Mathisson–Papapetrou equations and Papapetrou–Dixon equations. All three sets of equations describe the same physics.

These equations are named after Myron Mathisson,^[1] William Graham Dixon,^[2] and Achilles Papapetrou,^[3] who worked on them.

Throughout, this article uses the natural units c = G = 1, and tensor index notation.

The Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon (MPD) equations for a mass ${\displaystyle m}$ spinning body are

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {Dk_{\nu }}{D\tau }}+{\frac {1}{2}}S^{\lambda \mu }R_{\lambda \mu \nu \rho }V^{\rho }&=0,\\{\frac {DS^{\lambda \mu }}{D\tau }}+V^{\lambda }k^{\mu }-V^{\mu }k^{\lambda }&=0.\end{aligned}}}$

Here ${\displaystyle \tau }$ is the proper time along the trajectory, ${\displaystyle k_{\nu }}$ is the body's four-momentum

${\displaystyle k_{\nu }=\int _{t={\text{const}}}{T^{0}}_{\nu }{\sqrt {g}}d^{3}x,}$

the vector ${\displaystyle V^{\mu }}$ is the four-velocity of some reference point ${\displaystyle X^{\mu }}$ in the body, and the skew-symmetric tensor ${\displaystyle S^{\mu \nu }}$ is the angular momentum

${\displaystyle S^{\mu \nu }=\int _{t={\text{const}}}\left\{\left(x^{\mu }-X^{\mu }\right)T^{0\nu }-\left(x^{\nu }-X^{\nu }\right)T^{0\mu }\right\}{\sqrt {g}}d^{3}x}$

of the body about this point. In the time-slice integrals we are assuming that the body is compact enough that we can use flat coordinates within the body where the energy-momentum tensor ${\displaystyle T^{\mu \nu }}$ is non-zero.

As they stand, there are only ten equations to determine thirteen quantities. These quantities are the six components of ${\displaystyle S^{\lambda \mu }}$, the four components of ${\displaystyle k_{\nu }}$ and the three independent components of ${\displaystyle V^{\mu }}$. The equations must therefore be supplemented by three additional constraints which serve to determine which point in the body has velocity ${\displaystyle V^{\mu }}$. Mathison and Pirani originally chose to impose the condition ${\displaystyle V^{\mu }S_{\mu \nu }=0}$ which, although involving four components, contains only three constraints because ${\displaystyle V^{\mu }S_{\mu \nu }V^{\nu }}$ is identically zero. This condition, however, does not lead to a unique solution and can give rise to the mysterious "helical motions".^[4] The Tulczyjew–Dixon condition ${\displaystyle k_{\mu }S^{\mu \nu }=0}$ does lead to a unique solution as it selects the reference point ${\displaystyle X^{\mu }}$ to be the body's center of mass in the frame in which its momentum is ${\displaystyle (k_{0},k_{1},k_{2},k_{3})=(m,0,0,0)}$.

Accepting the Tulczyjew–Dixon condition ${\displaystyle k_{\mu }S^{\mu \nu }=0}$, we can manipulate the second of the MPD equations into the form

${\displaystyle {\frac {DS_{\lambda \mu }}{D\tau }}+{\frac {1}{m^{2}}}\left(S_{\lambda \rho }k_{\mu }{\frac {Dk^{\rho }}{D\tau }}+S_{\rho \mu }k_{\lambda }{\frac {Dk^{\rho }}{D\tau }}\right)=0,}$

This is a form of Fermi–Walker transport of the spin tensor along the trajectory – but one preserving orthogonality to the momentum vector ${\displaystyle k^{\mu }}$ rather than to the tangent vector ${\displaystyle V^{\mu }=dX^{\mu }/d\tau }$. Dixon calls this M-transport.

• Introduction to the mathematics of general relativity
• Geodesic equation
• Pauli–Lubanski pseudovector
• Test particle
• Relativistic angular momentum
• Center of mass (relativistic)

• C. Chicone; B. Mashhoon; B. Punsly (2005). "Relativistic motion of spinning particles in a gravitational field". Physics Letters A. 343 (1–3): 1–7. arXiv:gr-qc/0504146. Bibcode:2005PhLA..343....1C. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2005.05.072. hdl:10355/8357. S2CID 56132009.
• N. Messios (2007). "Spinning Particles in Spacetimes with Torsion". International Journal of Theoretical Physics. General Relativity and Gravitation. 46 (3). Springer: 562–575. Bibcode:2007IJTP...46..562M. doi:10.1007/s10773-006-9146-8. S2CID 119514028.
• D. Singh (2008). "An analytic perturbation approach for classical spinning particle dynamics". International Journal of Theoretical Physics. General Relativity and Gravitation. 40 (6). Springer: 1179–1192. arXiv:0706.0928. Bibcode:2008GReGr..40.1179S. doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0597-x. S2CID 7255389.
• L. F. O. Costa; J. Natário; M. Zilhão (2012). "Mathisson's helical motions demystified". AIP Conf. Proc. AIP Conference Proceedings. 1458: 367–370. arXiv:1206.7093. Bibcode:2012AIPC.1458..367C. doi:10.1063/1.4734436. S2CID 119306409.
• R. M. Plyatsko (1985). "Addition of the Pirani condition to the Mathisson-Papapetrou equations in a Schwarzschild field". Soviet Physics Journal. 28 (7). Springer: 601–604. Bibcode:1985SvPhJ..28..601P. doi:10.1007/BF00896195. S2CID 121704297.
• R.R. Lompay (2005). "Deriving Mathisson-Papapetrou equations from relativistic pseudomechanics". arXiv:gr-qc/0503054.
• R. Plyatsko (2011). "Can Mathisson-Papapetrou equations give clue to some problems in astrophysics?". arXiv:1110.2386 .
• M. Leclerc (2005). "Mathisson-Papapetrou equations in metric and gauge theories of gravity in a Lagrangian formulation". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 22 (16): 3203–3221. arXiv:gr-qc/0505021. Bibcode:2005CQGra..22.3203L. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/16/006. S2CID 2569951.
• R. Plyatsko; O. Stefanyshyn; M. Fenyk (2011). "Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations in the Schwarzschild and Kerr backgrounds". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 28 (19): 195025. arXiv:1110.1967. Bibcode:2011CQGra..28s5025P. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/19/195025. S2CID 119213540.
• R. Plyatsko; O. Stefanyshyn (2008). "On common solutions of Mathisson equations under different conditions". arXiv:0803.0121. Bibcode:2008arXiv0803.0121P. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
• R. M. Plyatsko; A. L. Vynar; Ya. N. Pelekh (1985). "Conditions for the appearance of gravitational ultrarelativistic spin-orbital interaction". Soviet Physics Journal. 28 (10). Springer: 773–776. Bibcode:1985SvPhJ..28..773P. doi:10.1007/BF00897946. S2CID 119799125.
• K. Svirskas; K. Pyragas (1991). "The spherically-symmetrical trajectories of spin particles in the Schwarzschild field". Astrophysics and Space Science. 179 (2). Springer: 275–283. Bibcode:1991Ap&SS.179..275S. doi:10.1007/BF00646947. S2CID 120108333.