In today's world, List of recumbent stone circles has gained unprecedented importance. Whether from an economic, technological, social or cultural point of view, List of recumbent stone circles is an issue that is constantly present in our lives. Its impact is so broad that its analysis and understanding is essential to understand the context in which we find ourselves. In this article, we will explore the different aspects and perspectives related to List of recumbent stone circles, with the aim of shedding light on its relevance and influence in our society.
Type of stone circle found in Aberdeenshire, Scotland
Recumbent stone circles are found in Aberdeenshire in northeast Scotland. Their most striking characteristic is that in the general direction of south-southwest there is a large stone lying on its side with its length lining up with the perimeter of the circle. Thought to have been from the Bronze Age, their unusual design, and the possibility of being associated with astronomical observations, has attracted several surveys starting at the beginning of the 20th century.
The particular characteristic of recumbent stone circles is that, as well as being a ring of upright stones (orthostats), they have a large stone lying on its side along the perimeter of the circle towards south to southwest. On both sides are particularly tall orthostats. The recumbent stone and flankers, as they are called, together form the recumbent setting. Around the ring the orthostats get progressively lower in height and more closely spaced until they reach the opposite side from the setting. These stone circles contain a low central ring cairn surrounded by comparatively small kerb stones.[1][2]
Thought to have been built in the Bronze Age, over the millennia many of these circles have become ruinous, being particularly vulnerable in the 18th and 19th centuries due to agricultural improvement, so many stones have fallen or been taken away and, indeed, only about half of the circles show any signs of a cairn without archaeological excavation.[3]
As early as 1527 Hector Boece was writing about the stone circles in Scottorum Historia.[1][4] Until the mid 19th century these circles, when they were noticed at all, were spoken of as being "Druidical Temples" or similar epithets and it was Frederick Coles who was the first person to carry out a systematic survey which he published in an annual series of papers from 1900 to 1907 in the Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.[5][note 1] Although Coles was careful and cautious in his identifications, he sometimes made misidentifications of circles in a ruinous condition.[6][7] Somewhat similar stone circles were later found in the far southwest of Ireland where they were originally called recumbent stone circles until significant differences led to them becoming called "Cork–Kerry stone circles" and later axial stone circles.[8][9]
OpenStreetMap display of recumbent circles (all but two in Aberdeenshire)
In 2013 a site at Hillhead was excavated and found to be a recumbent stone circle. The site had been noticed in 1998 but was thought to have been the location of the remains of a roundhouse. The excavation uncovered the sockets for two flankers and a depression in the ground where the recumbent probably lay.[32][33] Nether Coullie stone circle was listed in the 2011 RCAHS gazetteer as not being a recumbent stone circle but following careful inspection of archive records and another site inspection it was reclassified in 2015.[34][35]
Other stone circles investigated recently, but which have found to be modern, include Mill of Birkenbower and Holmhead.[36][37]
^ abCondition: condition from Burl (2000, Gazetteer). Burl classifies the sites as follows 1 (good) = Good, worth visiting; 2 (OK) = Good but restored; 3 (ruin) = Ruined but recognisable; 4 (gone) = Destroyed or unrecognisable; 5 (unc.) = Uncertain. S+F/T: Number of stones Standing + number Fallen or mere stumps / Total number originally. Details from Welfare (2011a, Appendix 3) for standing and fallen and Welfare (2011a, Individual site entry in gazetteer) for original total.
^ abCode for status of recumbent setting. W/w refers to west flanker, R/r to recumbent and E/e to east flanker. Upper case means standing, lower case means fallen, — means missing. Details from Welfare (2011a, Gazetteer entry for each circle) unless otherwise noted.
^ abDiameters from Welfare (2011a) except where otherwise noted. Maximum and minimum given when oval.
^ abAzimuth of the axis from centre of circle and over centre of recumbent stone from Ruggles (1984, Table 2). South is 180°, southwest is 225°.
^ abReference numbers are those of Burl (1995) and later edition and Burl (2000). In both books the entries are divided by traditional county (Ab=Aberdeenshire, An=Angus, Ba=Banffshire, Ki=Kincardinshire).
^ abCanmore site reference and OS grid reference from Welfare (2011a), grid references truncated from 8 to 6 figures.
^Coles' papers involving recumbent stone circles are listed below. See Frederick Coles for his whole series of PSAS papers including his 1910 summary table.
Noble, Gordon (2 January 2015). "Adam Welfare, edited by Stratford Halliday. Great crowns of stone: the recumbent stone circles of Scotland". Antiquity. 86 (332): 584–586. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00063109.
Ruggles, C. L. N. (1984) . "A New Study of the Aberdeenshire Recumbent Stone Circles, 1: Site Data". Journal for the History of Astronomy, Archaeoastronomy Supplement. 15: S55 –S76. Bibcode:1984JHAS...15...55R. ISSN0142-7253.
Welfare, Adam (2011). Halliday, Stratford (ed.). Great Crowns of Stone: The Recumbent Stone Circles of Scotland. Edinburgh: RCAHMS. ISBN978-1-902419-55-8.