In today's world, Kappa1 Sculptoris is a topic that generates a lot of interest and debate. From its origins to the present, Kappa1 Sculptoris has been the object of study and reflection by experts in different areas. Its impact on society, the economy, culture, and even politics, has been significant over time. In this article, we will explore different aspects related to Kappa1 Sculptoris, analyzing its relevance in the current context and its possible influence in the future. In addition, we will examine the various perspectives and opinions that exist around Kappa1 Sculptoris, with the aim of offering a broad and complete vision on this topic.
The pair orbit each other with an estimated period of 616 years, a semimajor axis of 1.5 arc seconds, and an eccentricity of 0.1.[7] Both components are evolved, yellow-white hued, F-typegiant stars. The primary, component A, has a visual magnitude of 6.23[2] and a stellar classification of F4 III.[2] The companion, component B, is magnitude 6.29[2] and of class F3 III.[2] Their composite spectrum is classified as F2V.[3] The mass ratio is 0.782, meaning the secondary is only 78.2% as massive as the primary.[12] An 18th magnitude companion star lies 73.4 arc seconds distant along a position angle of 243°, as of 1998.[13]
^ abHouk, Nancy (1979), Michigan catalogue of two-dimensional spectral types for the HD stars, vol. 3, Ann Arbor, Michigan: Dept. of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Bibcode:1982mcts.book.....H.
^ abHurly, P. R. (1975), "Combined-light UBV Photometry of 103 Bright Southern Visual Doubles", Monthly Notes of the Astronomical Society of Southern Africa, 34: 7, Bibcode:1975MNSSA..34....7H.
^ abcdDavid, Trevor J.; Hillenbrand, Lynne A. (2015), "The Ages of Early-Type Stars: Strömgren Photometric Methods Calibrated, Validated, Tested, and Applied to Hosts and Prospective Hosts of Directly Imaged Exoplanets", The Astrophysical Journal, 804 (2): 146, arXiv:1501.03154, Bibcode:2015ApJ...804..146D, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/146, S2CID33401607.