Enseosteus

In today's world, Enseosteus is a topic that has captured the attention of millions of people around the world. Whether due to its historical relevance, its impacts on society or its influence on popular culture, Enseosteus has become a focal point for debate and reflection. In this article, we will explore the different facets of Enseosteus and examine its importance in the current context. From its origin to its possible consequences, we will delve into an in-depth analysis of Enseosteus and its role in the modern world.

Enseosteus
Temporal range: Late Frasnian[1]
Enseosteus marocanensis
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Placodermi
Order: Arthrodira
Suborder: Brachythoraci
Family: Selenosteidae
Genus: Enseosteus
Jaeckel, 1919
Type species
Enseosteus jaekelli
Gross, 1932
Species
  • E. jaekelli Gross, 1932
  • E. hermanni Stensiö 1959
  • E. marocensis Rücklin, 2011
Synonyms
  • Ottonosteus jaekeli Stensiö, 1959

Enseosteus is an extinct genus of small selenosteid arthrodire placoderms known from the Upper Frasnian Kellwasserkalk facies of Late Devonian Germany[1] and Morocco.[2]

Enseosteus is very similar to the other Kellwasserkalk selenosteids, though, the type species, E. jaekelli, has a bulbous, knob-shaped rostrum. Denison (1978) synonymizes the genera Ottonosteus (O. jaekeli = E. hermanni) and Walterosteus with Enseosteus, claiming that the two genera are too similar to Enseosteus to merit separate genus status.[1] Rücklin (2011) agrees with Denison's synonymizing of Ottonosteus, but rejects Denison's synonymization of Walterosteus, claiming how Walterosteus has a contact between the rostral plate and the pineal plate, which Enseosteus does not.[2]

References

  1. ^ a b c Denison, Robert (1978). Handbook of Paleoichthyology, Volume 2, Placodermi. New York: Gustav Fischer Verlage. pp. 96–98. ISBN 9780895740274.
  2. ^ a b RÜCKLIN, MARTIN (January 14, 2011). "First selenosteid placoderms from the eastern Anti-Atlas of Morocco; osteology, phylogeny and palaeogeographical implications". Palaeontology. 56 (1): 25–62. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2010.01026.x.