In today's world, Elasmaria has become an increasingly relevant and present topic in society. With the advancement of technology and globalization, Elasmaria has become a fundamental element in people's daily lives, impacting different aspects such as the economy, politics, culture and the way we relate to others. In this article, we will explore in detail the importance of Elasmaria, its implications and how it has evolved over time. In addition, we will analyze its influence in various areas to better understand its relevance today.
Elasmarians Temporal range: Cretaceous,
| |
---|---|
![]() | |
Anabisetia | |
Scientific classification ![]() | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Clade: | Dinosauria |
Clade: | †Ornithischia |
Clade: | †Ornithopoda |
Clade: | †Elasmaria Calvo, Porfiri, and Novas, 2007 |
Genera | |
|
Elasmaria is a clade of ornithopods known from Cretaceous deposits in the former Gondwana (South America, Antarctica, Australia, and possibly Africa) that contains many bipedal ornithopods that were previously considered "hypsilophodonts".[1][2]
Calvo et al. (2007) coined Elasmaria to accommodate Macrogryphosaurus and Talenkauen, which they recovered as basal iguanodonts distinct from other iguanodontians in having mineralized plates on the ribs.[3] In 2016, a paper describing the genus Morrosaurus found Elasmaria to be far larger than its initial contents of two taxa, instead containing a variety of ornithopods from the Southern Hemisphere.[4] In 2021, under the Phylocode, Madzia et al. (2021) formally defined Elasmaria as "the smallest clade containing Macrogryphosaurus gondwanicus and Talenkauen santacrucensis, provided that it does not include Hypsilophodon foxii, Iguanodon bernissartensis, or Thescelosaurus neglectus.[5] Fonseca et al. (2024) redefined Elasmaria as "the largest clade containing Macrogryphosaurus gondwanicus and Talenkauen santacrucensis but not Dryosaurus altus, Hypsilophodon foxii, Iguanodon bernissartensis, and Thescelosaurus neglectus" so that it included more related taxa. The cladogram below follows their preferred reference phylogeny, taken from the results of their own study.[6]