Corpus Juris
In this article, we will delve into the fascinating world of Corpus Juris, exploring its different facets, its impact on the _var2 field, and the various opinions and positions that exist around this topic. From its origins to its presence today, Corpus Juris has sparked interest and debate among experts and enthusiasts alike. Through a thorough and rigorous analysis, we will seek to shed light on key aspects of Corpus Juris, examining its influence on _var3 and its potential to transform the future of _var4. This article also aims to give the reader a complete and balanced view of Corpus Juris, offering a multidimensional perspective that invites reflection and open dialogue.
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (December 2009) |
The legal term Corpus Juris means "body of law".
It was originally used by the Romans for several of their collections of all the laws in a certain field—see Corpus Juris Civilis—and was later adopted by medieval jurists in assembling the Corpus Juris Canonici.
Later the term was used for comprehensive collections of laws in the US, as in Corpus Juris Secundum. The term is commonly used to refer to the entire body of law of a country, jurisdiction, or court, such as "the corpus juris of the Supreme Court of the United States."
The phrase has been used in the European Union to describe the possibility of a European Legal Area, a European Public Prosecutor and a European Criminal Code. Eurosceptics in the United Kingdom attacked the plans, which they saw as a threat to the criminal law traditions of some member states, such as jury trials by independent juries, habeas corpus, and prohibitions against double jeopardy.[1]
See also
References
- ^ House of Lords (2008). The Treaty of Lisbon: an impact assessment, 10th report of session 2007-08. Vol. 2. London: Stationery Office. p. E-131. ISBN 978-0-10-401244-4.