This article will address the topic of Constitutional liberalism, one of the most relevant aspects in today's society. Constitutional liberalism has gained great importance in recent years due to its impact in different areas, from politics and economics to culture and technology. Through this article, the various facets of Constitutional liberalism and its influence on our daily lives will be explored. The different perspectives around Constitutional liberalism will be analyzed, as well as its evolution over time. In addition, the implications of Constitutional liberalism in the current context, as well as its possible future projections, will be examined. In order to offer a comprehensive vision about Constitutional liberalism, different approaches and opinions will be considered, with the purpose of providing a broad and objective vision on this topic of great relevance today.
Part of a series on |
Liberalism |
---|
![]() |
Constitutional liberalism is a form of government that upholds the principles of classical liberalism and the rule of law. It differs from liberal democracy in that it is not about the method of selecting government.[1]
The journalist and scholar Fareed Zakaria explains that constitutional liberalism "is about government's goals. It refers to the tradition, deep in Western history, that seeks to protect an individual's autonomy and dignity against coercion, whatever the source—state, church, or society".[2] In a constitutionally liberal state, a liberal market is regulated and protected at the level of the constitution and so trade is mostly free, but not entirely unhampered.[3]
Throughout history, democracy is becoming more common around the world, but it has been in decline for the last 13 years.[4] Freedom House reported that in 2018 there were 116 electoral democracies.[5] Many of these countries are not constitutionally liberal and can be described as illiberal democracies.[6][7] Constitutional liberalism is different from liberal constitutionalism. While the former asserts values of personal sovereignty at a constitutional level, the latter guards freedom to assert ones own values in the constitution,[8] and, as any constitutionalism designed to curb the tyrannical majority, is inherently antidemocratic.[9]