In today's article we are going to delve into the topic of Cessna 175 Skylark, which has captured the attention of experts and the general public. Cessna 175 Skylark is a topic of great relevance today, since it impacts different aspects of society, economy, politics and culture. Throughout this article we will explore the different aspects of Cessna 175 Skylark, analyzing its history, its current impact and possible future projections. In addition, we will examine the different perspectives and opinions that exist around Cessna 175 Skylark, with the aim of providing a broad and complete vision on this topic. Join us in this exploration of Cessna 175 Skylark and discover everything you need to know about this exciting topic!
175 Skylark | |
---|---|
![]() Cessna 175A Skylark | |
General information | |
Type | Light utility aircraft |
Manufacturer | Cessna Aircraft Company |
Number built | 2,108 |
History | |
Manufactured | 1958–1962 |
Introduction date | 1958 |
First flight | April 23, 1956 |
Developed from | Cessna 172 |
Variants | Cessna T-41 Mescalero |
The Cessna 175 is a light four-seat, single-engine, fixed wing aircraft produced by Cessna between 1958 and 1962. A deluxe model known as the Skylark was introduced in 1959 for the 1960 model year. The aircraft is very similar to the popular Cessna 172, but has higher gross weight and used a more powerful version of its engine with a geared reduction drive, achieving higher performance. The Cessna 175 sat between the Cessna 172 and the larger Cessna 182 in the product line at its debut.[1]
Declining sales stemming from reputedly poor engine reliability prompted Cessna to drop the 175 and Skylark nameplates, but the company continued to produce aircraft based on the 175 for several decades, selling them as variants of the 172 and as a military trainer aircraft, the T-41 Mescalero.
The 175 was designed to fill a niche between the Cessna 172 and the slightly heavier, larger and faster Cessna 182. The engine of the 175, a reduction drive or geared version of the O-300 (Continental GO-300) used in the 172, is rated at 175 hp (130 kW), or 30 hp (22 kW) more than the engine offered in the contemporary 172. Between 1958 and 1962, a total of 2,106 were built. The basic airplane was marketed as the 175, and the plane with a package of optional equipment and overall paint (a partial paint scheme was used on the basic model) was marketed as the Skylark.
The airframe of the 175 is all metal, constructed of aluminum alloy. The fuselage is a semi-monocoque structure, with exterior skin sheets riveted to formers and longerons. The strut-braced high wings are constructed of exterior skins riveted to spars and ribs. The 175 has fixed landing gear in a tricycle arrangement, with main gear legs made of spring steel, and a steerable nosewheel connected through an oleo strut for shock absorption.
While it incorporates airframe changes to accommodate an increased gross weight, the 175 is similar in appearance to the 172 of the same vintage. The main design change was the introduction of a stepped firewall in the 175, allowing the use of a longer cowl with larger air intakes, increasing airflow for improved engine cooling. The firewall was mounted further back in the fuselage than in the 172, and Cessna in turn relocated the instrument panel rearward into a wider section of the fuselage, allowing it to be enlarged and laid out differently than the 172 instrument panel. With the 1960 introduction of the 175A, Cessna introduced a swept-back vertical fin shared with the 172, along with a distinct engine cowling hump that serves as the most distinct external 175 spotting feature. Cessna also fitted the 175's stepped firewall and enlarged, relocated instrument panel to the 172 starting with the 172B model.[2]
The other significant internal change from the 172 is a structural redesign of the inner third of the wings, allowing the installation of larger fuel tanks that hold 52 US gallons (200 L; 43 imp gal) versus 42 US gallons (160 L; 35 imp gal) in the 172; however, due to the location of the fuel pickups, only 42 gallons is usable in all flight conditions, and Cessna advised that only 167 hp (125 kW) may be available at the 175's best angle of climb.[2]
Although externally near-identical to the 172 with most parts aft of the firewall being interchangeable, the 175 was built to a different type certificate.[2][3] The P172D and R172 series (including the T-41B/C/D Mescalero) share the 175 type certificate, along with the 172RG, the retractable landing gear version of the 172.[2][4]
An unusual feature of the 175 is the geared GO-300 engine. Whereas most single-engine airplanes use direct drive, this engine drives the propeller through a reduction drive, so the engine runs at 3200 RPM to turn the propeller at 2400 RPM (4:3). The GO-300 engine suffered reliability problems and helped give the 175 a poor reputation. Some Skylarks flying today have been converted to larger-displacement direct-drive engines[5][6] though almost 90% still retain the GO-300.[7]
Modern authorities consider the GO-300's tainted reputation to be undeserved because pilots unfamiliar with reduction-drive engines often did not realize that the GO-300 must always be operated at relatively high RPM as specified in the Pilot's Operating Handbook (POH). Rather than cruising at 2900 RPM or higher as specified in the POH, pilots would cruise at lower RPM settings (2300–2700) appropriate for direct-drive engines in other light aircraft, which caused harmonic vibration in the reduction gear between the quill shaft (that turned the propeller) and crankshaft, and resulted in low airspeed that prevented the engine's cooling system from operating effectively. At 2500 RPM and below, the GO-300 does not generate sufficient oil pressure for adequate lubrication and cooling. These factors cause chronic reliability problems in 175s that are persistently operated at low RPM.[2][5] Confusing provisions in the original POH may have contributed to the problems, as it lists cruise speed and fuel burn down to 2400 RPM or 36% power, creating the misleading impression that sustained cruise at this RPM setting is advisable.[2] Authorities also advise pilots of the 175 to descend gradually at constant power settings and to always keep a load on the engine, as the reduction drive makes it possible for airflow through the propeller to drive the engine during descent, which can result in engine damage.[2]
Cessna has historically used model years similar to U.S. auto manufacturers, with sales of new models typically starting a few months prior to the actual calendar year.
Data from Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1962–63[10]
General characteristics
Performance
Related development