Welcome to the article about *Axiom schema of predicative separation*, a topic that arouses the interest of millions of people around the world. In this post, we will thoroughly explore the different aspects related to *Axiom schema of predicative separation*, from its history and evolution to its impacts on today's society. Along these lines, we will discover fascinating facts, analyze expert opinions and share practical advice for those who wish to delve deeper into this exciting topic. Get ready to immerse yourself in a journey of knowledge and discovery about *Axiom schema of predicative separation*. Let's get started!

This article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2024) |

In axiomatic set theory, the **axiom schema of predicative separation**, or of **restricted**, or **Δ _{0}** separation, is a schema of axioms which is a restriction of the usual axiom schema of separation in Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory.
This name Δ

The axiom asserts only the existence of a subset of a set if that subset can be defined without reference to the entire universe of sets. The formal statement of this is the same as full separation schema, but with a restriction on the formulas that may be used: For any formula φ,

provided that φ contains only bounded quantifiers and, as usual, that the variable *y* is not free in it.
So all quantifiers in φ, if any, must appear in the forms

for some sub-formula ψ and, of course, the definition of is bound to those rules as well.

This restriction is necessary from a predicative point of view, since the universe of all sets contains the set being defined. If it were referenced in the definition of the set, the definition would be circular.

The axiom appears in the systems of constructive set theory CST and CZF, as well as in the system of Kripke–Platek set theory.

Although the schema contains one axiom for each restricted formula φ, it is possible in CZF to replace this schema with a finite number of axioms.^{[1]}

**^**Aczel, Peter; Rathjen, Michael (August 19, 2010). "CST Book Draft" (PDF). p. 97.

- Tennant, Neil (2021). "Does Choice Really Imply Excluded Middle? Part II: Historical, Philosophical, and Foundational Reflections on the Goodman–Myhill Result†".
*Philosophia Mathematica*.**29**: 28–63. doi:10.1093/philmat/nkaa010.