This article will address Amato Group, a topic of great relevance in the current context. Amato Group has aroused great interest in various areas, since its impact is felt in numerous spheres of society. Over the years, Amato Group has acquired increasing importance, which has motivated the interest of academics, professionals and experts in the field. In this sense, it is essential to thoroughly analyze and understand Amato Group, in order to be able to identify its implications and consequences. Therefore, throughout this article different aspects related to Amato Group will be explored, from its origin to its influence today.
This article needs additional citations for verification. (December 2009) |
History of the European Union |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
The Amato Group, officially the Action Committee for European Democracy (ACED) was a group of high-level European politicians unofficially working, over 2006–2007, on rewriting the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe into what became known as the Treaty of Lisbon (December 2007) following the earlier treaty's rejection, in 2005, by referendums in France and the Netherlands.
Led by Giuliano Amato (thus the group's unofficial name), a former Prime Minister of Italy who was also Vice-President of the original European Convention, the group was backed by the Barroso Commission, who sent two representatives, the commissioners Danuta Hübner (regional policy) and Margot Wallström (communications).[1]
The group consisted of 16 members from 14 member states of the European Union, including one current European Commissioner:[2]
The group first met in Rome on 30 September 2006. On 4 June 2007 they released the completed draft text. The size of the text is cut from 63,000 words in 448 articles in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (EU Constitution) to 12,800 in 70 articles in the proposed text of a new EU-treaty.[3] The sized down text came from including only the innovations contained in the third part of the EU Constitution – which essentially ties together former EU treaties – and putting them into additional protocols. The two protocols would be attached to the existing Treaty on the European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community.
The text stripped the rejected constitution of its constitutional elements, including the article on the EU's symbols and the controversial "God-less" preamble, reduced the Charter of Fundamental Rights to one legally binding article and foresees a new name for new EU foreign policy chief, called 'Union foreign minister' in the Constitution.
The new treaty would not include everything in a single document, as the Constitution would do, but rather:[3]
As a result, the new TEU defines the framework of the European Union, whereas the amended TEC defines in detail the law and decision making procedures, what the policy areas of the Union are, and which law or decision making procedure should be followed in a certain policy area. Both treaties would have the same legal value, as is the case with the current TEU and TEC. Furthermore, the Charter of Fundamental Rights would have the same legal value as the new TEU and the amended TEC.
Titles I to IX of the new TEU are literally taken over from Part I of the European Constitution, with only the following modifications:[3]
Furthermore, the article concerning the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs is maintained in the new TEU (Article I-28 of the European Constitution, Article 27 of the new treaty), but the Amato Group has stated it has no problem with a name change.[4]