In today's world, 2008 United States Senate election in South Dakota is a topic that has gained unprecedented relevance. Whether in the scientific, social, political or cultural sphere, 2008 United States Senate election in South Dakota has become a point of interest and constant debate. With the advancement of technology and globalization, 2008 United States Senate election in South Dakota has taken on new dimensions and challenges, impacting the lives of millions of people around the world. In this article, we will explore different aspects related to 2008 United States Senate election in South Dakota, from its origins to its influence on today's society. We will analyze its importance in the current context and reflect on its future.
![]() | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Johnson: 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% >90% Dykstra: 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% Tie: 50% | |||||||||||||||||
|
Elections in South Dakota |
---|
![]() |
The 2008 United States Senate election in South Dakota was held on November 4, 2008. Primary elections were held on June 3, 2008.[1] Incumbent Senator Tim Johnson won re-election to a third term. As of 2024, this election alongside the simultaneous House race is the last time a Democrat won a statewide election in South Dakota. This is also the last time that a Senate candidate and a presidential candidate of different political parties simultaneously won South Dakota. Johnson Improving Obama perfomace in that presidential election in the state by just 17.74%
In 2002, Tim Johnson was re-elected by a narrow margin of 527 votes, the closest senate contest in the country that cycle.[2] Two years later, Republicans flipped the state's other senate seat, ousting then Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle.[3] Heading into 2008, the seat was poised to be a heavily contested one, and Republicans saw as a strong potential flip.[4]
But the race would be upended on December 13, 2006, when Senator Johnson was hospitalized with what was later revealed to be a brain hemorrhage.[5][6] This immediately shook up the state of the race, and dashed much of the discourse surrounding it for a time.[7] On the Democratic side, there was uncertainty if Johnson would be able to return to the Senate, and speculation surrounded whether Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin, the state's at-large Congresswoman, would run in his place.[8][9]
However, by all accounts, Johnson still intended to run for re-election as long as his health kept improving, and prominent Democrats such as Harry Reid and Ted Kennedy held fundraisers for Johnson.[9] After a 9-month absence, Johnson returned to the Senate in August 2007, and was back to his duties as Senator in September 2007.[10] One month later, Johnson ended all speculation, by announcing his bid for re-election.[11]
Republican efforts for recruitment were frustrated by Johnson's situation and the sympathy boost that came with it.[15] Significant hope was given to the possibility of recruiting second term governor Mike Rounds to run against Johnson, but Rounds showed little interest.[12] Lt. Governor Dennis Daugaard, who was wealthy and could self fund, was also sought, but he was planning a gubernatorial bid for 2010.[12] On July 5, 2007, Joel Dykstra, a state representative, entered but he was seen as having long odds and as not a top-tier candidate.[16][17]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Joel Dykstra | 34,598 | 65.74% | |
Republican | Sam Kephart | 13,047 | 24.79% | |
Republican | Charles Gonyo | 4,983 | 9.47% | |
Total votes | 52,628 | 100.00% |
Already a well-regarded figure, following health problems, Johnson became more popular. "South Dakota is a very kind state," Steve Jarding, a Harvard political scientist who ran Johnson's campaign, said. "People were rooting for Tim—Democrats, Republicans, independents—they wanted him to be O.K.[4]" He was also seen a pragmatic moderate. He received endorsements from the Republican Mayor of Sioux Falls, Dave Munson, and the NRA Political Victory Fund.[19] Johnson also received the endorsement of former Senator Larry Pressler, who Johnson beat in 1996.[20][21]
Dykstra argued that Johnson voted 80% of the time with U.S. Senator Barack Obama and 90% with U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. In response, Johnson pointed out his votes on the confirmation of U.S. Supreme Court justices John Roberts/Samuel Alito, against flag burning, in favor for the Iraq War, Patriot Act, a ban on partial birth abortion, etc.[22]
Dykstra tried to turn the race around by comparing Johnson to Larry Pressler in 1996, and that Dykstra would work better with the state's other senator.[23] Dykstra also focused on high gas prices, highlighting his experience in the energy industry, and a focus on alternate energy sources.[24] But Johnson's popularity and sympathy proved to be the main factor, giving him a large amount of sympathy vote.[25]
Source | Ranking | As of |
---|---|---|
The Cook Political Report[26] | Likely D | October 23, 2008 |
CQ Politics[27] | Safe D | October 31, 2008 |
Rothenberg Political Report[28] | Safe D | November 2, 2008 |
Real Clear Politics[29] | Safe D | November 4, 2008 |
Poll Source | Dates administered | Tim Johnson (D) |
Joel Dykstra (R) |
---|---|---|---|
Rasmussen Reports[30] | March 4, 2008 | 63% | 28% |
Rasmussen Reports[31] | July 15, 2008 | 60% | 38% |
While John McCain won the state comfortably, Johnson easily won re-election to a third term, losing in only four counties. His friend and fellow Democrat, Stephanie Herseth Sandlin easily won re-election to South Dakota's at-large congressional district.[32]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | Tim Johnson (incumbent) | 237,889 | 62.49% | +12.87% | |
Republican | Joel Dykstra | 142,784 | 37.51% | −11.96% | |
Total votes | 380,673 | 100.00% | N/A | ||
Democratic hold |